BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 27 Apr 2014 07:22:48 -0500
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<B105D15B9EDA4CAC8FCFF77E35B0E62E@LionelPC>
Subject:
Re: New report casts doubt on neonics as causing bee decline
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252"; reply-type=original
From:
Lionel Evans <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines) 
Hi beeks,

As this thread carries on, neonics are headed in a direction as the best 
thing to ever happen.

I am in my 40th year as a bee haver/keeper. 1974, the only thing was 
American foul brood and Nosema.

We would treat AFB with sulphur, may not have killed spores, but knocked it 
back greatly.

We knew to keep bees away from cotton fields where pesticides were used. 
Beans did not have many pests.

Corn always had worms at the end of the ears and often if corn was planted 
late, leaf worms.

Aerial sprayers were not used. This is a totally different time for honey 
bees.

Is greed a leader in the pack?

Lionel

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2