BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 28 Mar 2012 07:30:22 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
>
> Many beekeepers are accepting higher losses as the new normal. I even
> fight the concept myself by thinking losses in the low 20% is good.
>
>
> Only sideline & commercial usually look close at die offs.
> few hives (not even a statistic ) are tested by researchers.
>

But this flies in the face of what was found in Canada by Medhat. Treat for
Varroa and nosema and you are back to pre-mite die off levels. I do not
know how close many of them were to treated canaola, which would tell even
more.

Bill Truesdell
Bath, Maine

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm

ATOM RSS1 RSS2