BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain
Date:
Tue, 29 May 2012 16:40:50 -0400
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Message-ID:
Sender:
From:
Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
> Peter, are the researchers basing "huge potential" on real world field evidence of serious harm or fanciful imagining?

Those are the only two choices? First, the inert ingredients have not been studied all that much so there is real *potential* for harm. Second, they vastly increase the effectiveness of products, & the combinations have not been tested, only the active ingredients alone. Third, this topic was raised at the Bee Research conference in Beltsville this winter, so I would not call it fanciful imagining.

PLB

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm

ATOM RSS1 RSS2