Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 23 Oct 2012 13:57:01 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hello Everyone,
I am a new beekeeper this year in the San Francisco bay area and am becoming active in my local club in which many members are treatment free advocates. I would like to try to encourage a different approach to treatment free beekeeping within my club which is for a hive that appears varroa or disease succeptible that rather than let that hive die, to treat once with one of the non-pesticide treatments such as MAQS or thymol, and requeen preferably with one from local "survivor" queen, with the hopes of averting dead out varroa factories. I would like to suggest the idea that single treatment followed by requeening is treatment free, the single treatment does not purpetuate the existing genetic line and is simply a way to provide a platform to change the hive genetics more efficiently than hive death. After 2 months or less any treated bee or brood will be gone and the hive is for all intents and purposes is a new one.
My question is at what point in the year would such a strategy be best employed if one wanted to balance the concepts of both "treatment free beekeeping" and aggresive requeening to get there. My intial thought is when one does a mite check on Aug 15th. My personal approach is the IPM strategy outlined by Randy Oliver. I appologize in advance if this has been covered previously, or if this ends up being contentious...
Thank you, Mark
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm
|
|
|