Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:47:54 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>
> >Even if half that 6% were non-viable mites emerging during the six days,
> that
> would still require a daily natural drop of around 3% of the total mite
> population.
> That seems high to me under most conditions. What am I missing?
What I was saying that the 1-hr dusting drop equalled the natural drop that
I had counted for the previous 6 days. It was merely an observation of the
data, not theoretical. But let's do the math to see whether it was a
fluke.
Say that there are 100 total mites in the hive, 2/3 in the brood (although
likely half at some times of the season).
So 33 are phoretic. If dusting causes 34% of these to drop, then about 11
would drop.
Let's compare that figure to see if it would equal the expected natural drop
for 6 days:
If 2/3 of the mites are in the brood, that makes 67 of the hundred in the
brood. They will all emerge within 12 days, so about 6 would be emerging
per day. If 50% of those drop naturally, that is about 3 per day.
So we are in the same ballpark. Does that help?
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm
|
|
|