Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 29 Dec 2012 18:11:20 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>Randy, can you give us a cliff notes version abstract?
OK, short version:
The 600 hives belonged to 12 beekeepers from several states, but all going
to almonds. I don't know whether the findings apply to others.
1. Fall cluster size of 11 frames appears to be a defining tip point.
Larger colonies lost strength November through Feb 1; smaller colonies
gained strength (if they survived).
2. All colonies trended toward 9-10 frame strength at the end of
January, no matter what the starting strength in fall. This could be
partially due to beekeeper management during winter (feeding was allowed
for individual colonies).
3. Winter mortality increased linearly as fall strength decreased from
12 frames to 5 frames (didn't analyze many colonies less than 7 frames in
fall, none under 5 frames).
4. There was little winter mortality of the colonies above 11 frames in
fall.
5. In my California group, treatment with dsRNA product targeted at IAPV
(and secondarily ABPV and KBV) greatly reduced winter mortality.
6. It appears to me that colonies smaller than 11 frames in fall already
had issues. The smaller the colony, the more likely that those issues
would cause winter dwindling or mortality. The positive effect of
treatment suggests that acute viruses had strong negative effects on weak
colonies over winter.
--
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm
|
|
|