BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Date:
Sun, 19 Dec 2010 07:31:05 -0500
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
In-Reply-To:
<AD2FEEAEEA794A9784323320069F3174@bobPC>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
From:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
> I think its reasonable to say (from those on the list ) that bees do poorly
> on canola ( Allen dicks diary information) but seem to recover after removed
> from *Canola.*  This is also true of many crops on which the neonicotinoids
> are used.

And those where it is not used. Has a lot to do with what the bee is
able to get from the crop. Blueberries are classic. You almost always
go in heavy and come out light. So it is a leap to go from "do poorly"
to assigning the blame to neonicotinoids. Lots of things can be at
play.

Bill Truesdell
Bath, Maine

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm

ATOM RSS1 RSS2