Sender: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 25 Oct 2010 07:53:35 -0600 |
Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
<113E0967406F4720810C407D93EB3A05@Romulus> |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252";
reply-type=original |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Organization: |
Deep Thought |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
?>> Cheap, common GRAS additives used for prevention or suppression of
fungus of food would be ideal and tests of several are scheduled, but the
progress thus far has been excruciatingly slow.
> GRAS additives are frequently *not safe* in larger quantities. Examples in
> the bee industry are thymol, menthol, phenol, etc.
You are right, Pete, but given the alternatives, these compounds are least
likely to attract regulatory objections and most likely to be safe until
proven otherwise. Of the examples you cited, some are obviously more likely
to flunk out in that regard than others. (You forgot to mention sassafras).
Of course the dose is critical in assessing any substance. Even healthy
foods can be harmful if consumed to excess. The initial problem is to find
any of the many which work and then the focus shifts to potential collateral
damage.
Adding complexity to the problem is that some individuals exhibit unusual
sensitivity to some compounds. This was the case with sulpha drugs for AFB.
The concern about antibiotic use was actually secondary to the sensitivity
issue in the banning of sulfathiazole.
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm
|
|
|