Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 10 Oct 2011 20:10:21 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>That's why I used 50 hives, which were dropping large numbers of mites. I
>doubt that lack of duration was the issue.
That is assuming that every day is the same as the next, and I'm guessing
that is not true.
>An r squared close to zero. The data points were just a random scatter.
Yes, but there were no negative drops, so maybe that method, as respected
as it is, is being misapplied.
>So did I. But I have no reason to doubt the actual data.
I am questioning the analysis.
> the accuracy of which is supported by your measurements, there should be
> a correlation over time.
I am sure there is.
>Allen, I have no investment in one method being "better" than another, and
>have no compulsion to defend anything--I'm just trying, as always, to
>objectively compare various methods.
And that is the way it should be.
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm
|
|
|