BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 20 Jan 2011 17:12:04 GMT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
From: [log in to unmask]
>I agree wholly with Randy.  Lab bees in cages don't have the same  dynamics 
as whole populations of bees.

agreed!  so why are caged studies such a large part of the research being done...including your own recent (and excelent) work?  why should we be skeptical of a neonic study that (probably) was on caged bees, but not of a study of nosema/virus infected bees in cages?

http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0013181
"Laboratory cage trials with a strain of IIV type 6 and Nosema ceranae confirmed that co-infection with these two pathogens was more lethal to bees than either pathogen alone."

deknow

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm

ATOM RSS1 RSS2