BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Message-ID:
<0BDE66010CCA4798AE1085BA74418FB6@Romulus>
Sender:
[log in to unmask]
Subject:
Re: What do you think the results were?
From:
allen <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 19 Dec 2010 11:40:23 -0700
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Organization:
Deep Thought
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines) 
?> > No real scientist would ever make a categorical claim like that.

> Allen, that "categorical claim" is the title of the paper.  The paper was 
> peer reviewed and published in the Journal of Economic Entomology in 2007.

My point exactly.

Whatever has happened to real science?

Anyone trained in science care to comment? 

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm

ATOM RSS1 RSS2