Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 9 Mar 2009 16:40:15 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> I will love to have a benchmark for the later: reduce chemical applications
> ... or how much is enough?
>
> for example:
>
> Excellent: up to 1 (spring) p y/s, organic.
>
>
> Nosema
> .
> Amazing: No fumagilin for 5 years, and no spores found.
>
I meet those criteria (except mine is a fall treatment of OA) and my bees
are not Varroa tolerant. I have not treated for nosema for 15 years.
As far as no nosema spores, that might be totally impossible since it is not
a function of the bees, but the environment they are in. From all that I
have seen, nosema is everywhere in a variety of forms and might even easily
change into a new variant. One variant is sprayed as a pesticide for
locusts.
So, for me, the queens already meet the next to best criteria.
Amazing: No treatment for more than 5 years/seasons!!
>
That is the real criteria. But then you get into arguments as to just what
constitutes treatment.
Bill Truesdell
Bath, Maine
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|