BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Robert Brenchley <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 19 Dec 2008 14:02:26 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
 
In a message dated 16/12/2008 12:42:33 GMT Standard Time, [log in to unmask]  
writes:

<<Could they actually 'learn' to defend themselves?  Some  years ago I  did 
regular examinations of fallen mites from one hive  over a period of  months. 
I 
didn't just count the mites, I looked at  them through a x10  lens.  Over 
time the 
proportion of damaged :  undamaged mites increased  markedly.  From memory it 
started out  at about 10% and ended up at about  40%.

Has anybody else tried  this?

Chris>>


    There could be other reasons for this besides  learning. At the beginning 
of the season, the bees are going to be struggling to  manage a relatively 
large quantity of brood; once the broodnest starts  shrinking, there are likely 
to be a lot more available for other  activities.  

Regards,

Robert Brenchley
Birmingham  UK


*******************************************************
* Search the BEE-L archives at:                       *
* http://listserv.albany.edu:8080/cgi-bin/wa?S1=bee-l *
*******************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2