Brian Fredericksen wrote:
> or maybe you have some science to quote why it would be a great day to continue the use of the 
> products for mere cosmetic reasons? 

Interesting that you want the burden to be on the consumer to prove 
they need it rather than the government to prove they do not.

I am sure that women do not need makeup for the same reason, cosmetic 
in nature only and all those chemicals applied not to a  lawn, but 
directly to their faces. Love to see the organic people fight that fight.

Your proposal is the nanny state taken to its illogical extreme.

Bill Truesdell (Since I will be turned in to the sexist police by 
comparing women and cosmetics to lawns...Did you hear that they found 
the oldest human fossil jawbone. The jawbone was well over several 
million years old. They determined it was a woman's since it was still 
moving.)
Bath, Maine

****************************************************
* General Information About BEE-L is available at: *
* http://www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/default.htm   *
****************************************************