Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 13 Oct 2008 22:21:02 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Maryam Henein writes: “And as far as i am concerned that fact that the
losses are happening in France, Greece, Italy, Slovenia...etc... and that
beekeepers independantly come to the conclusion tnat toxins are effecting
their bees, serves as emprical proof. Are all these beekeepers nuts? I
don't think so. Let's give them some credit.”
In defense of science, I have to respectfully take exception to this
view. First of all the author refers to scientists that she says she has
talked to, but offers no specific reference as to their identity or their
work. It makes it kind of hard to know how much weight to give it.
Then there is the willingness to accept as empirical proof the
conclusions of a whole bunch of people whether they are independent of each
other or not. Specifically where is the empirical evidence, that we can
all look at, that supports what all these beekeepers have concluded? I
seem to remember from my history studies, a few cases where what almost
everybody concluded turned out to be dead wrong. So I just have a
different idea about what the term empirical proof means.
I am making no claims about whether pesticides are killing bees in
Europe or not, but I suspect that this may be a case where the
dreaded “agenda factor” may be clouding the issue. This happens when
people get attached to an idea, in this case the idea that all chemical
pesticides are bad, and allow that attachment to affect what really ought
to be raiser sharp objectivity in an area where that is what is called
for.
Beekeeper’s don’t have to be nuts to be mistaken. At least as a
hypotheses, what everybody thinks is true usually has some credibility,
certainly enough to warrant some scientific research. But if you are going
to invoke the name of science and empirical proof, you have an obligation
to avoid confusing them with what amounts to something that appears, on the
face of it, more like belief.
Steve Noble
****************************************************
* General Information About BEE-L is available at: *
* http://www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/default.htm *
****************************************************
|
|
|