Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 9 Mar 2009 11:09:16 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> Therein lies a quandary. Try this thought experiment. Imagine we have a
> superbee now that is adequate in most ways. It won't be accepted by the
> pollinators until it's proven in the field. Where would you find a
> commercial beekeeper willing to risk all that he has worked for and give
> up the easy fix of chemical control?
Therein lies the problem -- all or nothing thinking. We see it in the "No
Treatments - Never!" camp and in the Drug and chemical addicted camps.
We are not going to make the quantum leap to no treatments. Some apparently
do, but that approach is too risky and uncertain for most.
And, a superbee is not at all what I am advocating. It will never come to
be. I am advocating making sure all commercial stocks are moving steadily
towards disease and pest resistance. That path is not risky and it is not
difficult.
We are getting towards universal tolerance to varroa and other problems by
baby steps, and one giant hurdle is the fact that some US queen producers
are not getting on board the effort to bring up the *background* resistance.
At risk of confusing the issue, some complain that *Australian imports* are
diluting American resistance efforts. This may or may not be true, since my
understanding is that the better Australian breeders import stock that has
the desired resistance characteristics, but I really do not know. I
suspect, though, that if we want to find major culprits, that looking closer
to home would be equally or more rewarding.
I should add, too, that even having a superbee does not mean nobody will
treat. No matter what, some will treat automatically without even
monitoring mites, however, my position is that maintaining highly
susceptible stocks should be something that draws notice and unfavourable
comment from other beekeepers.
Peer pressure is strong in this industry. Currently the peer pressure is
towards thinking about treatment, not prevention. We need to change the
focus.
Merely shining a spotlight on those who ignore the public good can produce
change.
Don't think that a queen producer who get the same questions about disease
and pest resistance from every customer repeatedly is not going to get with
the program.
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|