BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Subject:
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 16 Aug 2007 06:56:55 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
>if it is true then should not resistant mites be far
> less virulent if they reproduce only half as rapidly?
My point exactly!  Covered in my article.

 > Judging from the colonies losses caused by resistant mites this certainly 
does not seem to be
> true.
One observes that the mites don't seem to be building as rapidly, and may 
think that one is getting mites "under control."
Then the next season, when the treatment fails completely, they devastate 
you!
If the mites reproduced only half as fast, that would extend the population 
doubling time from about one month, to two months.
Less virulent, yes.  But still eventually lethal.  : (
Randy 

******************************************************
* Full guidelines for BEE-L posting are at:          *
* http://www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm  *
******************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2