Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 21 Feb 2007 18:18:31 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> I do not think it fair, at least at this time, to name the product unless
> it proves to be defective.
Well, you've already suggested that pollen supplement was to blame. Given
the way that some people read, this guess has already turned into fact and
certainty in many minds, and now includes *all* supplements, since some lean
that way anyhow.
Better that you name names and we promptly compare notes, test if necessary,
and exonerate the product -- as I am sure we will -- than have this doubt
over all.
> I do not think it fair, at least at this time, to name the product unless
> it proves to be defective.
At this point, after making that suggestion I don't think it is fair not to.
If you are right, people need to know right now.
If you are wrong, people need to know right now.
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and other info ---
|
|
|