Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 11 Oct 2007 08:39:16 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
To get the best bee for an area you need high numbers of colonies which
nature may not provide. Places like Alaska come to mind.
The study really only says that the more drones the better number of
characteristics and distribution of traits. With large numbers of
colonies you get a "buffer" against change. It is not that you get some
sudden change in the character of the bee, but you get survivors from
bees that are already there. The genetic makeup of a diverse population
does that with about every species.
Where I am, the population of bees is small because of Varroa. So bees
in this area might be selected for specific conditions but then die out
quickly with a change from those conditions. All because there are not
enough of them to have the genetic diversity to survive.
There is not usually a change in the DNA of a species that allows a
species to survive, but the expression of genes within that species.
Major genetic change usually leads to a new species that does not revert
back.
Mites are a case in point. If you leave Apistan resistant Varroa alone
for a number of years they revert to the non-resistant mite. There is a
stable (a bad word) mite that gains an advantage not being resistant
unless that resistance is necessary. Same with bees. Change the pressure
and they will revert to what worked best in the past.
Bill Truesdell
Bath, Maine
******************************************************
* Full guidelines for BEE-L posting are at: *
* http://www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm *
******************************************************
|
|
|