Sender: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 5 Sep 2007 16:51:05 EDT |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="UTF-8" |
From: |
|
Comments: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In a message dated 05/09/2007 19:16:32 GMT Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:
An ‘assumption’ is by definition:
“Something taken for granted or accepted as true without proof; a
supposition”
I hadn't realised my earlier response only went to you. Your definition of
an assumption is fine, and as I said, the great bulk of the article is fine as
well. The bit I queried - maybe it stands out to me since it bears on my
particular area of interest - is this paragraph:
<<A particularly fascinating find is an inscription on a ceramic storage jar
found near the beehives that reads “To nmsh”. This name was also found
inscribed on another storage jar from a slightly later occupation level at Tel
Rehov, dated to the time of the Omride Dynasty in the 9th century BCE.
Moreover, this same name was found on a contemporary jar from nearby Tel Amal,
situated in the Gan HaShelosha National Park (Sachne). The name “Nimshi” is known
in the Bible as the name of the father and in several verses the grandfather
of Jehu, the founder of the dynasty that usurped power from the Omrides (II
Kings: 9-12). It is possible that the discovery of three inscriptions bearing
this name in the same region and dating to the same period indicates that Jehu
’s family originated from the Beth Shean Valley and possibly even from the
large city located at Tel Rehov. The large apiary discovered at the site might
have belonged to this illustrious local clan. >>
We seem to have jumped from a name to an assumption, as defined by yourself,
that the name belonged to a particular family, and from that to assumptions
about the 'possible' (a word beloved by those who indulge in these
speculations) origins of the family of King Jehu. The name is known from Samaria,
having been found inscribed on a potsherd, but there's no demonstrated link to
Jehu or his family. The most that can be said is that someone linked either to
the jars or to the apiary shared a name with the father or grandfather of
Jehu.
Regards,
Robert Brenchley,
Birmingham UK
******************************************************
* Full guidelines for BEE-L posting are at: *
* http://www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm *
******************************************************
|
|
|