Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Sat, 13 May 2006 12:08:56 -0400 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed |
Comments: |
RFC822 error: <W> MESSAGE-ID field duplicated. Last occurrence
was retained. |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hey Bill, I know ALL that. The issue I'm trying to get at is the HFCS
is being blamed for obesity, where other sweeteners don't seem to
share in the blame. If there IS something in HFCS that is to blame,
and some of it is being relocated into the honey and the changes in
it brought about by the bees doesn't change what is suggested to be
the harmful property of HFCS, then my question remains... how much
HFCS can be in the honey before it's detectible.
I've heard 5% and I've heard "miniscule" and now you've suggested
that it's irrelevant, that it's all just fructose and sucrose
anyway. This MAY be true, and HFCS may not have any blame in
obesity. It is getting to be perceived as a cause, however.
My question, and maybe I wasn't real clear, was how much HFCS is
getting into our honey, not by purposeful adulteration but simply by feeding.
At 12:00 AM 5/13/2006, you wrote:
>It has been determined that sugar is found in honey.
>
>If organic honey is devoid of sucrose, glucose and fructose, then
>the rest of us beekeepers are
>producing non-organic honey since ours is loaded with it.
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and other info ---
|
|
|