Peter Borst <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>This is an interesting concept, but it has a couple of weak points. First,
>queen breeders *are* selecting for bees that do not require chemicals,,,, 

Hello Peter!

In reading the quote over:

“>Our results allow us to conclude that the
>problems facing the apicultural industry with
>mite infestations probably is linked to the apicultural
>system”

It appears they are suggesting it is linked to the “apicultural system”.  
If we are not assured that the breeders ‘and their neighbors’ that are 
contributing drone source to this system aren’t also selecting for 'ALL 
stock taht contribute drone source or not' that do not require treatments, 
the statement seems fit.

or
>require limited application. 

The problem here would be determining what a limited application actually 
is, or what level of assistance an application is actually providing. 

Second, if you don't treat and all the bees
>die, you have nothing left from which to select.

This is true, but IMO this is a potential risk that exists even if one 
does treat all their bees or provides limited treatments.  

Best Wishes,
Joe

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---