Sender: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 4 May 2007 08:13:20 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Scot McPherson wrote:
> Organic beekeeping is far less costly than standard commercial practices.
> Less fuel costs, less medication costs, less lumber and wax replacement
> costs, healtier bees that don't need to be replaced as often and therefore
> build up faster since not new installations every year.
A major cost item that I don't see on your list, is labor. My
understanding is that "organic" is expensive because is more
labor-intensive than standard commercial practice. Is your labor free?
As a hobbyist, I don't have to worry about hiring help, but if I did,
all the money I have invested in bees, equipment, and supplies in the
last 8 years would barely be enough to pay for even one hired hand for
13 weeks in the summer (at minimum wage).
Please, if you are going to make a strong statement about one beekeeping
method being "cheaper" than another, don't leave out major cost items.
--
Tim Eisele
[log in to unmask]
******************************************************
* Full guidelines for BEE-L posting are at: *
* http://www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm *
******************************************************
|
|
|