BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Subject:
From:
Robert Brenchley <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 17 Nov 2006 17:04:23 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
 
In a message dated 17/11/2006 13:53:15 GMT Standard Time,  
[log in to unmask] writes:

<<Hi Dave,
I think you are referring to the cases of "Anarchy"  that were found, where
many laying workers were thriving above a queen  excluder. This is indeed
rare, but they DO NOT produce queens. I don't know  of ONE single credible
account of a honey bee worker ever producing an egg  that turned into a queen
(excluding Cape Bees, of  course).>>



I can't place the source, but I've read somewhere  that thelytoky was first 
observed in a strain of 'Punic bees' from Tunisia,  brought to England by John 
Hewitt in, as far as I can make out, the 1880's. I  believe the phenomenon was 
spotted in 1892, and the queen ended up in the  British Museum of Natural 
History. If anyone lives in London, I would imagine  she's still there. It would 
be interesting to know more.  

Regards,

Robert Brenchley
Birmingham  UK


-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---

ATOM RSS1 RSS2