reference: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/5215022.stm
Thanks Steve for that article.
When I read through it I found these flaws, either by the hand of Louisa
Cheung who wrote the article for the BBC or the investigating University
group:
For instance it was written: "The University of Newcastle-led group took
some 100 bumblebees belonging to the common species Bombus terrestris and
tagged some of them with tiny identification numbers". I personally don't
believe that it went like that, surely the University guys took and tagged
the full 100 bumblebees not just some of those 100. The fact that the
accompanying photo shows a tagged bee with number 53 also suggests that at
least more than 50 were used, but even around 50 would seem a low number
anyway. And why were 100 selected in the first place if they were not meant
to be tagged all? What could any untagged bees have to add to the study?
The BBC article did not specifically state if the 100 or so bumblebees from
the study were taken from only one colony or perhaps from several colonies,
the only indication could be the singular form used in the sentence: "a
webcam in the hive".
Ron van Mierlo
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and other info ---