Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Mar 2006 20:25:03 GMT |
Content-Disposition: |
inline |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
8bit |
Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>>...fluvalinate...has limited partitioning (0.002 mg/L or 2 micrograms/L) into water-based liquids (honey)
Does this mean that, if you throw wax combs into water, very little fluvalinate will migrate from the wax into the water?
>>(MSDS) for Apistan lists acute toxicity for rainbow trout as 2.7 micrograms/L in a 96 hour study!.... I'm not comfortable ingesting it myself.
I'm thinking this explains the reported damage to queens/drones. I believe fish and amphibians are much more susceptible to toxins than mammals.
>>What was once thought of as an 'acceptable level' can be 'unacceptable' later.
I've been recently listening with interest to Gary Knoll (www.garyknoll.com) on PRI (Public Radio International)... He says a lot of chemicals INDIVIDUALLY may have non-toxic levels for humans. However, a lot of the scientific studies - including ones by the FDA - don't account for the interaction of the low doses of these chemicals with hundreds of other chemicals in the body. For this reason, a lot of previously acceptable levels have been tightened.
>>Half will likely be fed back to new packages of bees.
Better feed it all to the packages than yourself, my friend. :)
Waldemar
Long Island, NY
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and other info ---
|
|
|