Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 15 Nov 2006 21:10:59 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Peter wrote,
> The general hypothesis has to be: high labour cost (closely
> associated with high GDP per capita) equals high operating cost per
> beehive leading to uneconomic beekeeping if income (mostly honey and
> pollination fees) does not increase to match.
The GDP is closely tried to productivity.
Example, years ago where easy loaders were common place and now forklifts
are.
Once where hand load extractors where common, now auto-loaders are.
All are faster and take no extra labor, many cases they take less.
Once 5,000 hives outfits were large, now they're mid size.
My point is the data that you guys are referring to is not accurate, because
allot of keepers do not fill out the census, county, state, ect.. report
which leaves discrepancy in the numbers.
Just take a look at how many hives show up at the almonds this year, amazing
how dollars (hive rents) brings these numbers up.
Keith Jarrett
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and other info ---
|
|
|