Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 3 Aug 2006 08:51:54 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
From: "Peter Borst" <[log in to unmask]>
> First, I do not regard the Aebis as an accurate source of information on the
> biology of honey bees. They are folksy writers and fun to read, but let's
> leave it at that.
Hardy agreement. The Aebis' books are a fun read.
> If they had the egg stealing trait, would this lead to their survival and
> the perpetuation of this trait? Of course not. They would survive as a
> colony, but the trait would not be retained because the blood line of the
> colony has been replaced by that of another colony!
This is assuming that the trait is not present in all bees... rather than just a segment of bees.
> Contrast this with the trait for stealing honey from other hives. If
> colonies lacked this trait, they could starve when they ran out of food
> supplies; if they have this trait, they gain an advantage.
Indeed, this is a ubiquitous trait... as the egg-stealing trait could be... though it requires certain environmental triggers to be exibited.
> Furthermore, we all know that queenless colonies develop laying workers, and
> the colony will "try" to raise queens from worker eggs. If they "think" they
> are going to get a queen this way -- then why would they steal eggs? They
> already have *eggs*.
A good point, but there are numerous geneticly-predispositioned behaviors that are not exhibited except in the presence of specific environmental triggers. It is possible that the choice of a laying worker or a stolen egg as a survival technique might be controlled by environmental conditions.
Larry Krengel - thinking that evolution has been made too simple.
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and other info ---
|
|
|