Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 8 Apr 2007 14:51:25 +0000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi All
Bob wrote about Diana Cox-Foster, reminding us that comb can be virus-contaminated.
Steve asked:
> 1. How many years can you safely use brood comb? It seems
> like you could have virus infected comb after one season
and Chris asked:
> How do they persist on comb? For how long?
Here (http://www.bbka.org.uk/articles/bee_diseases.php) it is stated that Sac Brood Virus becomes non-infective within a few weeks. Longer than many viruses away from their hosts, but not long enough to for re-infection from equipment vacated in the winter and re-occupied in the subsequent summer. Of the other picorna viruses more strongly associated with Parastic Mite Syndrome, I know nothing. Does anyone?
Bob mentioned that Diana Cox-Foster's research, suggesting that comb renewal could be important to reduce virus load. Reading her papers (this one in particular):
http://vir.sgmjournals.org/cgi/content/full/86/8/2281
.. it would seem that Varroa and its saliva does carry some picorna-like viruses and could be a vector, but also the queen lays virus-contaminated eggs and that worker to larva transmission takes place. Simply renewing comb is unlikely to break the cycle of infection with this and related viruses, and so I doubt that comb renewal could be justified on this issue alone.
One of our regulars wrote this back in 1999:
"Destroying older combs that are still in good shape is another of those
things small-time beekeepers do to make sure that they stay small-time."
Yet comb renewal has become a popular call - does anyone have concrete evidence of a benefit from comb renewal, beyond the possibility of relief from Foulbrood, Nosema and perhaps Chalkbrood?
all the best
Gavin
******************************************************
* Full guidelines for BEE-L posting are at: *
* http://www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm *
******************************************************
|
|
|