BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"J. Waggle" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 10 Jan 2006 04:37:13 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
--- Dave Cushman <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> If the low number of brood (and hence mites) is due
> to a longer life 
> span of individual bees, then there is no change in
> possible honey 
> gathering potential.


The article stated that "both brood area (number of
brood cells) and the average honey crop harvested were
higher in each year of the experiment in the so-called
susceptible colonies (colonies with high mite loads)
compared to the resistant colonies (low mite loads)!"

It seems to suggest that if there was a longer life
span in the low brood colonies, it did not seem to
have a positive effect on honey production.





		
__________________________________________ 
Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about. 
Just $16.99/mo. or less. 
dsl.yahoo.com 

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---

ATOM RSS1 RSS2