Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 17 Oct 2006 20:30:43 -0700 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Mark wrote,
> We could have a consensus of views amongst ourselves here on Bee-L. But, I
> don't think that that consensus would be representative of anything other
> than a small portion of the beekeeping industry.
>
> I know very few beekeepers who spend any time on line. They may not be
> interested in sharing their views in this fashion. They may not be
> internet savvy. They may be too busy being beekeepers.
>
> Of course, there are exceptions.
Mark you may bee close to the mark on your thoughts.
But here's something to consider, Kim Flottum of Bee Culture, wrote about
BEE-L in this months Oct "almond pollination 2007" issue. Also both
articles in A.B.J on almonds Oct & up coming Nov issues by myself & Randy O.
came to life partly because of mis info being posted on BEE-L.That's what
motivated us to do this article in the first place.
Also some of the largest brokers & keepers read this list and forward many
of our post, don't under estimate how far BEE-L reaches.
Keith Jarrett
Calif.
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and other info ---
|
|
|