Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 13 Oct 2006 17:22:45 GMT |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>>I did a lot of research on conventional and alternate treatments
for cancer, especially my specific cancer. Most of the "
natural"substances can inhibit some cancer's growth or kill it, but
most of those studies are in a petri dish and not with people.
Bill, I am not an expert on cancer. I do know cancer is an abnormal
growth of cells that outpace healthy cells. It seems to affect us
more as we age since our DNA replication becomes increasingly
imperfect. In my view, nutritional supplements that help the cells
repair the DNA are key to reversing and then preventing cancer.
>>cure route for her breast cancer. My wife told here about my
arthritis and bee stings and that the stinging kept the cancer in
check. Maybe so, but there are people who did not get stung and their
melanoma did not spread.
It seems to me that the stinging triggered something in the body that
allowed it to help itself. Without chemo or radiation. This is
good. Stinging is beneficial in a significant number of MS cases,
too. I don't hold my breath that the medical establishment will warm
up to it any time soon though. Beekeeping reps don't offer
doctors/nurses free perks like dinners etc.
I am not a big fan of the so-called 'quack-busters.' It's not a
topic for this list.
>>But what cured me was surgery to take it out and that it had not
spread.
I am glad that surgery was helpful. My wife is an RN in the
operating room so I get a lot of first-hand info but surgery is the
last resort for me. A lot of surgery is preventable with life style
changes.
As far as medical care and hospitals, I'd refer to a recent issue of
Newsweek. There is an objective article on how some hospitals are
starting to turn themselves around. It's encouraging.
>>Plus, there was one more false statement. Many health organizations
(including my HMO and the two hospitals in my area) promote
preventative medicine.
In a periodic circular sent to members or in practice? I am of a
different opinion. If I had my way, medicine would primarly be used
to evaluate one's health, provide healthy guidelines and then focus
on monitoring one's well being. Those choosing to smoke, drink, use
drugs, let themselves get obese etc. would be required to bear their
disproportionate portion of today's healthcare costs. I realize this
would not be easy to implement but it should be the goal.
>>Euell died soon after his last book of heart disease. The natural
crowd tried to blame it on other things. But all those natural foods
should have taken care of any disease.
This is wrong. Natural foods don't contain all the nutrients in
sufficient quantities we need to maintain wellness. Good luck in
finding carnosine in a plant food! According to quality studies,
supplementation is needed. If you ever notice, strict
vegetarians who don't supplement age quite quickly.
>>I love the latest research that show that an extensive exercise
regimen and staying thin add 10 months to your life compared to
moderate sloth and moderately overweight..
Good exercise is 25% of the recipe. The other 25% is good
nutrition. The remaining 50% is your mindset.
>>The key to living long is to pick your parent carefully and enjoy
the life God has given you..
;-) I agree although I have not seen any evidence that the 1st part
is possible... One has to work with what they have been given. If
you continually strive to eliminate toxins (chem and stress), you
automatically increase your chances of a long, healthy life.
Waldemar
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and other info ---
|
|
|