BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Subject:
From:
allen dick <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 18 Oct 2005 15:29:54 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
> Until then, NEW evidence shows that there is no such thing as SMR
> honeybees.
> http://www.ars.usda.gov/research/publications/Publications.htm?seq_no_115=178712

Well, I think the article you cited does not actually confirm your
assertions.  What it seems to show is that the effect that they were looking
for, and calling SMR was, in fact, mostly or entirely an hygienic effect and
may not exist.

BUT the SMR bees still exist, and have been incorporated into other lines,
and they *are* different from Spivak's HYG bees.  The latter reportedly
cannot suppress varroa very well, but the SMR bees do suppress mite
reproduction quite well -- just not the way the researchers initially
thought.

allen

I can't understand why people are frightened of new ideas. I'm frightened of
the old ones.
            -- John Cage

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---

ATOM RSS1 RSS2