BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Date:
Tue, 18 Oct 2005 17:59:11 +0100
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
From:
Dave Cushman <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
Hi Waldemar

> Perhaps the managed bees in the US are larger than in the UK.
 > Larger bees potentially might be more inclined to produce
 > smaller-cell natural comb.

I can see what you are getting at, but I think average bee size in USA
is smaller than UK, for two main reasons... Most US bees have a very low
percentage of AMM genes and all other races have smaller bodies.
Secondly the majority of foundation supplied in UK over the last fifty
years has been 5.45 mm or larger.


Regards & Best 73s, Dave Cushman, G8MZY
http://website.lineone.net/~dave.cushman or http://www.dave-cushman.net
Short FallBack M/c, Build 6.02/3.1 (stable)

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---

ATOM RSS1 RSS2