Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - BEE-L Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
BEE-L Home BEE-L Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Where's the "proof"? revisited
From:
Pencaemawr <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
[log in to unmask]
Date:
Tue, 18 Oct 2005 19:48:08 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Rip Bechmann wrote:

> (step 2) Gather as many observations regarding the sky, blue, etc. as
> possible, negative as well as positive, and develop a hypothesis had fits
> those observations.
>
> (step 3) You would then design a test to evaluate the validity of the
> hypothesis.
>
not so; you should design a test to disprove the hypothesis. If you
can't disprove it, then you have a good working hypothesis. As you point
out later, "Keeping in mind that nothing is ever
proven, only disproven."

> (step 4) You would determine if the hypothesis is valid
>
A hypothesis is only "valid" until is is disproven.

John Burgess

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV