Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - BEE-L Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
BEE-L Home BEE-L Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain
Date:
Thu, 16 Mar 2006 16:55:12 GMT
Content-Disposition:
inline
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: "Apistan" honey
From:
"[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
Sender:
[log in to unmask]
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (8 lines)
I have a basic question:  if fluvenite is wax solubeale, and fluvenite levels in honey have been found acceptable..., then why folks report problems with queens on contaminated wax?  After all, queens are not made out of wax. :)  Are the queens absorbing fluvenite through feed or air?

Perhaps tolerance for fluvenite in honey is set too high - I don't consider queens more delicate than humans.

Waldemar 

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV