BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Joe Waggle <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 3 Oct 2005 19:09:26 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
I found a colony that had a real good tolerance to varroa.  But after 2
attempts at hygienic testing by pin prick method on this colony,  I
discovered that it tested the poorest of them all and even resulted in the
colony sealing back up the cells.  Further visual examination revealed
that there seemed to be a disproportionately large amount of capped brood
in relation to uncapped brood, but the broodnest was developing well with
a nice pattern of young larvae, and the colony looked to be very healthy,
ans is among my better performers.

I checked the capped brood and found uncapped brood that appeared to be
the result of wax worm, suggesting further that they were non-hygienic.
Many of the workers in the capped brood appeared to have DWV and mites and
looked to be dead.  Seemingly, the colony had a trait that was beneficial
to the colony, keeping infested cells sealed to prevent varroa from
spreading.  Even though it was a survivor,  I decided it best to requeen
the colony.

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---

ATOM RSS1 RSS2