BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
[log in to unmask]
Date:
Wed, 7 Sep 2005 14:19:26 +0100
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Small Cell Test 2002-2004 Conducted In Norway
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<00a201c5b39e$cc0a7810$87dffed8@Nemo>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
From:
Pencaemawr <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines) 
allen dick wrote:

>
>> * Small cell group: An alcohol wash in Autumn during broodless period
>> revealed 14% mites per 100 bees, the range was 3-26%.
>
>
> An examination of the raw data would be interesting to determine the
> scatter
> and the means.
>
Surely the mean is 14% and the scatter is 3-26%, unless you have some
other measure in mind.

John Burgess
(only relevent quotes and no excessive signature. Will I succeed?)

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---

ATOM RSS1 RSS2