BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
Subject:
From:
Dick Marron <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 14 Nov 2005 11:14:11 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (8 lines)
>>>>You could call it evolution, but there is nothing to say that this sort of "evolution" is permanent since, as with the moths, if the stimulus is removed, the species reverts to its original state<<<<

The assumption of an "original state" troubles me. There is no such permanent thing; no baseline from which things diverge. There is merely the adaptive response of the organism to its' environment at a point in time. To say that the moths "reverted" is incorrect. They adapted to a new (to them) environment. 

Dick Marron

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---

ATOM RSS1 RSS2