Robin Dartington <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
'From: "Keith Malone" "There is no evidence that clearly points
> to us as the reason for climate changes."

Curious statement when just about every scientist working on the problem
has concluded otherwise. Just because some truth may be inconvenient does
not justify going into denial.'

But even with all the knowledge we currently have about weather, most scientists would agree that there is even more that we don't know.  We can take the information we have and make sound, judicious conclusions; but we don't know nearly all of the dynamics which constitute our world's weather, let alone what dynamics affected the weather tens of thousands of years ago.  We can take geological data and make some pretty sound conclusions, but......

With all that I have learned from the information that I've seen from the news services, articles, etc. this world has had periods of warming and cooling in the past.  What is to say that this is not the emergence of one of these periods as Keith has suggested?

Mike



---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::