Sender: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 1 Jul 2005 20:18:26 +0200 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>I find this interesting... I have wondered about the possibility of strains
>that use supersedure not being as likely to co-operate in a queen rearing
>operation.
>
>
Hi Dave,
Almost all of my hives will supersede the old queen when she is due to
be replaced. Any swarms are my own fault when I don't give them space
enough, or make some other mistake. That is for the first generation
from selected stock mated in area where I control the drone population.
F2 queens in production hives mated with local drones have a bigger
chance of swarming the second year. They are usually replaced by me with
reared queens within a year.
I would not use hives prone for swarming as finishers. They will try to
make their own queens and generally cause all kinds of trouble. I don't
see a link between bees prone to swarming and ability to produce good
cells.
>I am using strains with high AMM content, what race are you using ?
>
>
Buckfast with a mix of monticola, saharensis, carnica, ligustica, and
heaven knows what else... ;-) Even some AMM, I'm afraid. I deliberately
mixed in as much different genetics I could find when starting this
breeding program. All gentle non swarming bees that produced good was
selected. After 4 years they produce good, have more vigour, and are
still so gentle we rarely use veils. That is a closed population program.
--
Regards
P-O Gustafsson, Sweden
[log in to unmask] http://www.algonet.se/~beeman/
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
|
|
|