Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 4 Mar 2005 15:08:47 EST |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In a message dated 04/03/05 18:28:12 GMT Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:
<<My problem, how much of this is beekeeper lore or convenience, how much
based on real knowledge?
Me thinks this may set off a debate - hopefully more interesting than 100
other ways to clean excluders. Don't get me wrong, the first few posts
were interesting -- but I think that thread has run its course.
Jerry>>
One of the fattest queens I ever had went through an excluder. I was smoking
the bees (under the SBB) when I saw a kestrel drop on something s few yards
away, just beyond the hedge. I waited, and saw it fly up with what looked
like a small mammal, then realised I was still pumping the bellows; the bees
must have been half gassed. A few moments later, I found the queen crawling
about on the excluder. There were no eggs in the supers, so I have to asume I'd
just driven her upstairs. Since most of my queens are quite significantly
slimmer, they could probably get through if they wanted.
I don't like excluders, since bees don't seem to like going through them,
and I find they delay the occupation of the supers. I use them any time there's
no honey arch at the top of the broodbox, but once this is established, I
find that it keeps the queen below quite efficiently, and therefore remove them.
Regards,
Robert Brenchley
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
|
|
|