BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
Sender:
Subject:
From:
Peter Edwards <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 3 Jan 2004 22:12:46 -0000
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
Hervé asked:
'I wonder how those
who obtained official approval in their countries get
out of this kind of process. Is their approval system
different ?'

In the UK companies have to 'jump through hoops' in order to gain approval
for 'veterinary medicines' such as Apistan, Bayvarol etc. and this requires
a considerable amount of time, effort and money to produce all the required
data.

So, as Hervé said, it was clear that no private corporation was going to be
interested in such investment because the product is cheap and widely
available.  We wondered if we would ever be able to use these alternative
treatments that seemed to be working well, particularly in the Scandinavian
countries.

Then came the surprise.  Our government decided that if these products were
not defined as 'veterinary medicines' they would not require approval, so
they defined them as 'non-medicinal curative substances'!

We were, frankly, amazed - and delighted!  Common sense 1 - Red tape 0.

Peter Edwards
[log in to unmask]
www.stratford-upon-avon.freeserve.co.uk/

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2