Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 26 Nov 2004 01:05:36 +0100 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I do not know why I am taking the risk to jump in the
arena. Just for the fun of pleasant debates I guess...
:-)
It appears FGMO efficiency quadrature will not be
solved today. Yet I have a question in my mind since 3
years about it :
How does FGMO fogging work ?
The last hypothesis I remember was that droplets
prevent varroas from breathing. If so, why results
seems to vary so much from one test to another ?
Adding another anecdote to the pile : I have measured
varroas on oily coroplast every 24h before fogging for
3 days and then 5 hrs, 12 hrs, and 24 hrs after
fogging. I have not measured any significativ increase
of fallen mites with FGMO alone. But it was just me,
doing a couple of tests on a couple of hives. I do not
claim for any conclusion. But I am wondering if
struggling is the real mechanism. And if they can't
breath because of FGMO, why bee larvea can ?
Hervé
Qc, Canada
www.emelys.com
PS: as per litterature, and as you noticed, AO
drizzling is known to work when there is no brood,
applied by a scientist or non scientist... ;-)
Vous manquez d’espace pour stocker vos mails ?
Yahoo! Mail vous offre GRATUITEMENT 100 Mo !
Créez votre Yahoo! Mail sur http://fr.benefits.yahoo.com/
Le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger est arrivé ! Découvrez toutes les nouveautés pour dialoguer instantanément avec vos amis. A télécharger gratuitement sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
|
|
|