LISTSERV - BEE-L Archives - COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

LISTSERV Archives

BEE-L Home

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives

Options:

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message:

[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Topic:

[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Author:

[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Subject:

Re: 5.2 performance (was cell size in 1940's)

From:

phil MOORE <[log in to unmask]>

Reply To:

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 22:15:17 -0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

text/plain (13 lines)

.  We found 5.25 noticably
> outperformed even 5.3 in a controlled, but unpublished experiment.
>


In what way do they perform better? I have started using Pierco frames for
the past year in the UK and am wondering what your experiences were.
Regards Phil Moore

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM