Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 31 Mar 2004 03:52:41 EST |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In a message dated 31/03/2004 06:03:18 GMT Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:
> I think it would be more accurate to say that the UK and EU have
> simply stumbled upon a purely emotional/political stance which serves
> as a basis for attempting to restrict imports and thereby protect
> domestic producers without the need for all that boring and expensive
> "testing".
>
> Jim,
>
> As always perception is more important than reality. The public perception
> of GM food crops, rightly or wrongly, is that we don't know enough about them
> and until we do it is safest to regard them as being best avoided. This is
> a grass roots perception and is not government inspired; in fact the
> government appear to be pressing for GM and this is costing them a lot of popularity.
>
> I recently had an enquiry from a small local bakery who wanted to buy my
> honey to incorporate in their products. I told them it would be like pouring
> Chateauneuf de Pape in the stew but they bought it anyway. However as part of
> their supply risk assessment they wanted to know whether there was anything
> GM in my honey. I was happy to assure them that my hives are more than 6
> miles from where field crop trials took place last year.
>
> It is the customer who demands GM free products and the customer is always
> right (even when wrong).
>
> Chris
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
|
|
|