BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Subject:
From:
Date:
Wed, 4 Jun 2003 12:14:51 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
From: "Tim Vaughan" <[log in to unmask]>

> Todd, where did you get it? Remember scut workers hatch out a few days
> faster than EHBs, so that could account for everything from fast buildup
> to lots of queencells to their behavior.
>


I had considered the possibility, but didn't want to jump to any conclusions
yet.  After your post, I searched the archives, and did notice a number of
traits matching AHB behavior.

The nucs came from a migratory beekeeper here in Vermont, who also raises
his own queens.  I believe  his breeding operation is in the south (Georgia,
maybe).  I suppose AHB contamination  is a real possibility.  I'll keep a
close eye on the hive in question, and call the breeder.

Thanks for the input.

Todd.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2