Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 7 Oct 2003 17:15:52 +0100 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Allen & all
> Therefore, some of the unfit queens would have naturally have removed
> themselves from the ranks of the older queens by the 28 days. They don't
> mention any dead in their cages in the caged ones, either -- that I could
> notice. I wonder how these things were accounted for.
The document is the only info available and I do not know any of the
contributing people on a personal basis, I would have expected cage deaths
to be recorded if they occurred.
> Can we also conclude that any queens that were found to have had poor
> or bad patterns, in the mating nuc, were installed into hives anyways?
From the way I read it... Yes.
But it is hard work reading it, I think I will take a hammer and chisel to
the file so I can read it comfortably. (I have been reading the later pages
more than the early ones).
Best Regards & 73s, Dave Cushman... G8MZY
Beekeeping and Bee Breeding Website
http://website.lineone.net/~dave.cushman
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
|
|
|