Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 22 May 2003 08:27:41 +0100 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Peter Edwards said: " Just for the record I have bees in 22 apiaries and
there are many other
> beekeepers in this area. Not so sure about feral colonies - my view is
that
> they were all killed by varroa and we are now seeing the sites inhabited
by
> escaped swarms - which then die out - are replaced by more escaped swarms
> and so on. Should we define these as feral?"
Escaped swarms are no longer managed by man in any way, so surely count as
feral. They develop full-blown disease and infect managed hives in their
area, making it virtually impossible for us ever totally eliminate diseases,
even if beekeepers 'saw the light' and suddenly became co-operative.
Peter's 120 hives seems to offer a good sample for testing the theory that
just a few hives at random can suddenly show abnormal high Varooa
infestation (due probably to robbing an infected colony) , if all the hives
are individually monitored? Can I ask if they are?
Robin Dartington
>
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
|
|
|