Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 7 Oct 2003 10:28:55 +0100 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Allen & all
> > http://www.rirdc.gov.au/reports/HBE/03-049.pdf
>
> I'm glad to have this study brought to my attention. The conclusions are
> interesting, but some things are not clear to me. Maybe I did not read it
> well enough. (I always have problems scrolling around in PDFs).
I too, am surprised that so many documents are made hard to read in this
manner... But the content is magnificent.
> and after 21 days, some might well be culled by the
> beekeeper, due to bad patterns.
>
> It was not obvious to me if this effect was taken into account, or if this
> pre-culling between 7 and 28 days -- assuming it took place, as it always
> does in the real world -
The way I read this, no intervention took place.
I have a great deal more re-reading of this document to do and may seek to
publish some of it in a more conventional and 'easy to read' webpage format,
but that will have to wait as I have stacks of stuff on drone fertility and
semen viability to sort out first.
Best Regards & 73s, Dave Cushman... G8MZY
Beekeeping and Bee Breeding Website
http://website.lineone.net/~dave.cushman
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
|
|
|